 |
| Leila 091610 - 1 |
Why is the crotch shot so well loved, and loved on, by men? Many of us spend hours a day looking at photos and movies of them on the internet. Before the internet, we would rent videos with them. Millions of magazines sell the *crotch shot. There is an allure to the crotch shot for men, or at least this man.
I, and other bloggers, have written extensively on the artistic value of the crotch shot. Please read the content at these links for those points. I am not writing about that today. I am more interested in why most men, including me, have such a fascination with this type of explicit photo.
(Link1 - Photo Fermata) (Link2 What We Saw Today)
I remember when I first snuck a peak at dad's
Playboy stash back in the late 1970's.
Playboy didn't have graphic crotch shots back then. The women rarely spread their legs leaving this pre and early pubescent boy with no idea what was down there. All I knew was that something about that area enticed me to seeing it. The first detailed crotch shot for me came from an unlikely source, my mom's copy of
Gray's Anatomy (she is a nurse). That image didn't really do much for me because it was so... clinical and sterile. It had labels written in a fancy
italic font. It was not real. I wanted to see a photo of a real one.
 |
| Illustration from Gray's Anatomy - 1918 |
When my brother left for college in the early 1980's I found a few copies of
Penthouse he had hidden. I finally saw my first crotch shot. I was in puberty and it made me so aroused that the moment did not last long. I knew right then I had seen the holy grail, the part of the woman that held a power over me and always wanted to see, touch, taste, and have sex with. Since that time I've seen thousands of crotch shots through all the media I listed above.
While I usually grow tired of seeing such repetition, these photos will always pique my interest in the first few seconds. I believe this basic instinct to look and feel deep interest that overrides the higher brain functions that would normally disregard such experiences. Some part of me has the deep erotic and sensual need to know what beauty each woman has down there. It is the basic physical identity of gender and why men and women were built differently. We evolved to seek these parts out and to procreate. Without this deep desire, we would have died out.
I try to find beauty in the open leg imagery (all media) with an artistic and erotically sensual appreciation, but the basis of it is the deep, DNA programming in my true core that says, "you want that, go get it." As much as I try to make high-ended arguments for the merit of explicit imagery, most of it boils down to that truth of core desire.
 |
| Leila - 091610-2 |
For me, I don't want to see the open-legged shot first. I want to build to it. I don't want the shock of just seeing it first and being done with it. The slow visual foreplay helps build the stage to seeing the ultimate beauty of the moment. Without that buildup, the image or moment has no more sensual meaning than the drawing from Gray's Anatomy.
I've read criticism that the crotch shot objectifies the woman down to only being a vagina. As an artist, I agree with that line of thought, especially if that is all you see of the woman. As a mostly heterosexual man, I see that objectified body part, but I also see it as one of the ways into a woman. Obviously there is the literal opening into her. That should go without saying. The more profound opening is the personal, representational opening of sexual pleasure into a woman's life. I know there are many other physical erogenous areas to the woman's body, but let's be honest, this is probably the most obvious one. By my getting to know that and all of her body, her pleasures, her special spots, along with the intangible things like music, food, words, imagery, etc., that get her sexually aroused, I am a better lover which is rewarding for both of us. But getting back to the first part, is the crotch shot objectifying, my artistic answer involves lengthy discussions on intent, theme, etc. For my base male answer, yes. It is objectifying and it is my heterosexual nature to not only look, but look again and to maybe even be aroused by it.
 |
| Leila 091610 - 3 |
Even after having the pleasure and honor of enjoying this place on real women who shared themselves with me, that base desire is always still there. It is just stronger since I know how it feels when I caress it, taste it, and we make love. The visual images of it now represent all those shared sensation of sex.
I've looked at gay graphic images and notice the same trend. While those photos don't float my boat like explicit female photos, the details are very similar. These photos show models with flacid, semi, and fully erect penises. Some are touching themselves, others have no hands in sight. The testes and anuses are sometimes visible as well. These explicit images must work for gay and bisexual men (and probably a few women as well, but I will not speak for them). Even though procreation is impossible, the basic instinct of arousal is there. The only difference is the gender of the subject matter
Most of hardcore porn, whether with heterosexuals, lesbians, or gay men, includes many "two fer
" crotch shots. You see both partners naughty bits up close and in action (very different than
inaction). They are reduced down to the most basic and base aspect of sex, the part that usually leads to the orgasm. You now have objectified both partners. You have deconstructed the whole human sexuality to one specific moment, the core essence of it all.
 |
| Leila 091610 - 4 |
This manly desire, whether gay or straight, for seeing graphic representations of the **woman's or ***man's primary genitalia is innate for most sexually active men. It is a part of our DNA, our core essence. It feeds and inflames our masturbatory hunger as well. As with almost all behaviors, learned or native, they can be encouraged, shaped, changed, or even put into remission with lots of behavioral modification. My final question then is, should that instinct be left alone, altered, enlightened, or eradicated?
*Which is not the same as
the money shot. That is worth writing another post in the future.
** That sounds about as sexy as the
Gray's Anatomy drawing looks, so lets call it a pussy, kitty, or whatever term you find to your liking. I will not call it a
cunt because that word is so charged with venom these days that it is disservice to use it.
*** Use whichever term you like: dick, cock, penis, etc. I personally don't like the term pecker, but to each their own. Interesting how there is not another term for it that is as offensive as
cunt.
Photo note- Thanks Leila. I chose my photos of her because I too them pre - 2009
and the 2257 regs don't haunt them as much.
*The title comes from the genetic chromosomes that determine male physical gender, XY. (Women have XX chromosomes to identify physical gender.) The chromosomes got their name by their shapes.
